One thing that the CJEU failed to do in this case, however, is to completely eliminate the possibility of the use of, and reliance on, stereotypes within credibility assessment.
![does taking a gay test does taking a gay test](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dHvN90GsaJQ/WDchHv2we0I/AAAAAAAAGU8/xM9lswbQdNwL9I7rSL4ZSAym1pS-hVqvQCLcB/s320/arpd%2BHolborn.jpg)
“The Court was quick to state that ‘medical tests’ to prove a person’s sexuality are contrary to human rights.” The court went, rightly, as far as to ban sexually explicit questions from asylum interviews, recognising that a person’s sexuality is more than just sexual behaviour. Pornographic video or photographic evidence, even if produced by the applicant themselves, were also considered to be outside the limit of acceptable evidence. Thankfully the Court was quick to state that ‘medical tests’ to prove a person’s sexuality such as phallometry or vaginal photoplethysmography are contrary to human rights practices and cannot be used (however, in the Czech Republic, such practices have been reported in the courts as late as 2016). The CJEU went on to limit what cannot be used to assess credibility. The CJEU firstly confirmed that there can be an assessment as to whether an asylum seeker is gay or not – an asylum seeker simply claiming that they are gay is not always sufficient evidence to qualify for asylum. When this was appealed, the Dutch Council of State referred the case to the CJEU, asking what was the limit of what can be used as evidence of a credible claim by a gay asylum seeker. The Dutch authorities rejected to allow this as evidence. As part of the assessment, in an attempt to demonstrate that their asylum claim was true, two of the three applicants submitted pornographic video evidence of same-sex sexual acts that they had participated in. The 2014 case of A, B and C v Straatssectaris van Veilgheid en Justitie was referred to the CJEU by the Netherlands after each of the three applicants’ claim for asylum had been rejected for not being credible.
![does taking a gay test does taking a gay test](https://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/1826256/images/n-STANDARDIZED-TEST-628x314.jpg)
While the situation today is far from perfect, two cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) show how in the past unscientific, and human rights infringing medicalised tests have been used when assessing the sexuality of gay asylum seekers. However, as this blog has previously discussed, ‘proving’ whether a person is LGBTI, and therefore if their asylum claim is credible, is an almost impossible task. When this discrimination leads to individuals being persecuted because of their sexuality or gender identity, the victims are entitled to asylum under EU law. Homosexuality is illegal in at least 69 countries and discrimination against LGBTI persons is globally rampant.